What's not to love about redundancy when one first glances it? We, the creators of Smath have already explained that we love to do things repeatedly and redundantly and repeatedly. They should fall in love with redundancy. well, that's their fault for not falling in love with redundancy at first glance. If the reader of your report complains that they have already read your work and don't need to see it reprinted all over again below a graph, or they whine that now it's in a different form which must be puzzled over for a while until they figure it out or are told that it's a crutch for the program rather than use the 'f(x)' that was already defined in the text to generate the function.We the creators of SMath love it so much that we made it almost impossible to make a graph without using 'Augment'. It's so cool that the mathematicians of a bygone era chose to use it formally in linear algebra. We the creators of SMath love math and will force you to look at it. Once you are done, make sure the graph-defined functions have some flair because you will be forced to look at them forever.We, the creators of Smath have endless fun typing the same thing all over in numerous intricate ways. Just start all over again when it's time to prepare your graph. The functions you spent hours creating in body of the Smath analysis are useless when you need a graph.We, the creators of Smath find that blasphemous. In rare cases where you want to plot a function on the horizontal axis and the independent values on the vertical axis, don't.We, the creators of Smath have indestructible mouses are are not concerned about wearing them or our knuckles out.

To create a legend for your plot, the configuration of each trace will require a considerable amount of clicking through menus.Suggested additions for the special features that they should highlight:

Mathcad 5.0 student